Stairway to Heaven
Whenever a scandal arises
in relation to a nursing home, especially when accompanied by outrage on the
airwaves over the treatment of ‘mammy’ or ‘daddy’, I generally find myself
asking, ‘Well, what else did you expect?’
Nursing
homes are basically a form of long (or sometimes mercifully short)-term parking
for the inconvenient elderly. Outside of
the public sector, which is generally a cut above the rest, they are
purely money-making ventures, staffed at ground level mainly by people on minimum
wage, who, unless they are especially caring—and such individuals do exist—are not,
rationally speaking, likely to put themselves out beyond the minimum. Though the reported level of staffing in some
of these places might tend to make even that minimum problematical.
Now
nursing homes do tend to put up a brave front when you first visit them, but
that is more for relatives than residents, a way of helping the former salve
their consciences. ‘Oh, she’s in the
right place, after all!’ . . . ‘He’ll be grand there!’ etc. etc.
There’s
a film that appears now and again on TV, with Billy Connolly and a cast of
various ‘national treasures’, called Quartet, about a nursing home for
retired musicians, which is presented in such appealing detail that I’d be almost
tempted to dig out my didgeridoo go there myself. But, of course, it is pure fantasy. It bears the same relationship to the general
run of such establishments as The Quiet Man does to, say, modern-day
Moyross.
The
bottom line is that, even if you really do care about your elderly relatives,
you have to accept—medical needs aside—that putting them into a home must of
necessity involve a certain diminution of standards. Really, I’d go as far as to say that you
really don’t have a right to expect more than the bare minimum. Arses wiped when their supposed to be wiped,
meals delivered on time, a basic level of medical oversight, no gratuitous ill-treatment
etc. etc. I really do think that if
you get that, then you’re probably doing relatively well.
Of
course, the second question I tend to ask when confronted on-screen by often overreacting
relatives is, ‘How come, if you are so concerned about the treatment of your
elderly, you don’t look after them yourselves?’
But
then that is quite an easy one to answer in many, if not in all, cases.
To
the extent that modern society has made the family slave to the machine, rather
than the other way around, it has made any other option almost impossible. Who is expected to do the caring in a society
when most people have an economic gun to their head compelling them to work
outside the home? And what of the micky
mouse nature of modern house design, with third bedrooms—even where they have third
bedrooms—indistinguishable from cupboards?
In
Treblinka, there was a chute that led to the gas chambers. It was jokingly called the ‘Roadway to Heaven’. And once you were in it there was no way out
of it, and one’s fate was fixed. And
really I think that modern society and the forces of modern society—the governments
and the banks and the pressure groups and the ideologies and the various opinion-forming
mediums—are intent on pushing us into a chute of their own creating.
The
thing that unites all the various popular and luvvie causes that infest the
world at the moment and the various liberal and left influenced political movements
is that they are all made up predominantly of people—and often the same people—who
have a passion to micro-manage everyone else’s life: what you say, how
you dress, what you eat, your beliefs, your thoughts—the machinery is already
there that makes that possible—and so on etc.etc.
Of
course, it is for your own good; it is always for our own good. The funny thing is historically how the
restrictions placed on populations rarely apply to the controllers themselves.
They
tend, at least in terms of the modern variety, to be far too bohemian for that
. . .